The new Primary History Curriculum is (whisper it) really good

Click here if you want to view this blog as a Word document (it might be easier with all the tables).

A copy of the New National Curriculum can be downloaded from the DfE website.

The history programmes of study have been the most controversial aspect of the curriculum review process. The current draft document, which is likely to become law in August with some minor revisions, is very different from the draft history curriculum published in February. These changes are likely to be welcomed by primary school teachers.

In reviewing the changes from the current National Curriculum, published in 2000, I’ve found it useful, in terms of trying to understand the differences and implications for planning and teaching, to examine both programmes of study side-by-side.

After having read through both documents it is striking how similar they are in their aims, although the content at KS.2 has some significant differences.

History – Programmes of Study

Key Stage 1

Key Stage 1: Purpose & Aims

Curriculum 2000 New Curriculum Differences
Chronological understanding – place events & objects in chronological order - Know where people & events fit within chronological framework-Develop an awareness of the past & passing of time Small change in the need for children to develop more awareness of time.
Vocabulary – use common words & phrases relating to passing of time  - Use wide vocabulary of everyday historical terms No change
Processes – recognise why people did things, why events happened & results - Use parts of stories & other sources to show that they know & understand key features This seems a small change, emphasising more the use of stories
Differences – between ways of life at different times - Similarities & differences No change
Representation – identify different ways the past is represented - Some of the ways the past is represented No Change
Historical Enquiry – use a range of different sources of information - Understand some of the ways we find out about the past No change
Questioning – ask & answer questions about the past - Ask & answer questions No change
Communicate – Select from knowledge of history & communicate in a variety of ways This is not expressed explicitly in KS.1 but is one of the programmes of study main aims

 

KS.1 Breadth of Study

Curriculum 2000 New Curriculum Differences
Changes – own lives, family & others - Changes within living memory, reveal aspects of change in national life Small change in emphasis towards national events
Ways of life – people in the past, local or national - Significant historical events, people and places in their own locality. No change
Significant people – from history of Britain or worldfor example, artists, engineers, explorers, inventors, pioneers, rulers, saints, scientists - Lives of significant individuals in the past who have contributed to national and international achievements.e.g. Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria, Christopher Columbus and Neil Armstrong, William Caxton and Tim Berners-Lee, Pieter Bruegel the Elder and LS Lowry, Rosa Parks and Emily Davison, Mary Seacole and Edith Cavell The new curriculum is more specific and offers a longer list. But is not prescriptive, the choice remains with schools.
Past events – from history of Britain or worldfor example, events such as the Gunpowder Plot, the Olympic Games other events that are commemorated - Events beyond living memory that are significant nationally or globally e.g. the Great Fire of London, the first aeroplane flight or events commemorated through festivals or anniversaries Small changes.

 Implications for KS.1

Displayed like this it is obvious the new curriculum will represent very little change for the teaching of history at Key Stage 1.

Note: the suggested examples for studying significant people and past events are non-prescriptive.

 

Key Stage 2

Not surprisingly there are more changes between the purpose and aims at Key Stage 2, but maybe not as many as you might think.

Key Stage 2: Purpose & Aims

Curriculum 2000 New Curriculum Differences
Chronological understanding – events, people & changes in correct periods of time - Develop a chronologically secure knowledge and understanding No change
Vocabulary – use dates, passing of time, incl. ancient, modern etc  - Develop the appropriate use of historical terms No change
Features of the past – of periods & societies, incl ideas, beliefs, attitudes & experiences - Know and understand significant aspects of history: nature of ancient civilisations; expansion & dissolution empires; characteristic features of past non-European societies; achievements & follies of mankind The aims for the new curriculum are taken from the over aims of history PoS & include KS3. There does seem a shift in emphasis here, but the difference relies on interpretation of ‘aspects’ & ‘nature’, both terms are ambiguous.
Diversity – social, cultural, religious & ethnic - Gain historical perspective by placing their growing knowledge into different contexts This is a significant difference, the new curriculum putting much less emphasis on diversity. Although, again, it would seem to be a matter of interpretation. ‘Contexts’ is a very wide term.
Causes – identify & describe reasons for & against historical events, situations & changes - …questions about change, cause, similarity and difference, and significance No change
Links – describe & make links between events, situations etc - Note connections, contrasts and trends over time- Establishing clear narratives within and across periods of study Little change, although the new curriculum does put a welcome emphasis on narrative in both KS1 & KS2
Historical interpretation – Recognise the past is represented & interpreted in diff ways  - Understand how our knowledge of the past is constructed from a range of sources and that different versions of past events may exist, giving some reasons for this. No change
Historical Enquiry – find out about the past using diff media - Understand the methods of historical enquiry, how evidence is used to make historical claims, & discern how & why contrasting arguments & interpretations of the past have been constructed No change
Questioning – ask & answer questions, select & record information - Regularly address and sometimes devise historically valid questions There is a small change in emphasis here with the introduction of the word ‘sometimes’
Organise – Recall, select & organise information - Construct informed responses that involve thoughtful selection and organisation of relevant historical information No change
Communicate – Communicate knowledge & understanding in a variety of ways - Make connections, draw contrasts, analyse trends, frame historically-valid questions and create their own structured accounts, including written narratives and analyses No change

The really noticeable changes are in the units of study.

KS.2 Breadth of Study

Curriculum 2000 New Curriculum Differences
Overview - During the key stage, pupils should be taught the Knowledge, skills and understanding through: a local history study; three British history studies; a European history study; a world history study Overview – In planning teachers should combine overview & depth studies to help pupils understand both the long arc of development and the complexity of specific aspects of the content. There is a shift here towards understanding how history ‘fits together’ & events from one time period affect another. However, there is no requirement to teach the different areas of study chronologically (see below).
1. Local history study- A study investigating how an aspect in the local area has changed over a long period of time, or how the locality was affected by a significant national or local event or development or by the work of a significant individual. 1. A local history study For example:- a depth study linked to one of the British areas of study listed below- a study over time tracing how several aspects national history are reflected in the locality (this can go beyond 1066)- a study of an aspect of history or a site dating from a period beyond 1066 that is significant in the locality. Little change.However, it is worth noting in the new curriculum the local history study can be incorporated with one of the other history studies as a depth study, effectively making it possible to reduce the number of history studies in KS.2 to 8.
2. Changes in Britain from the Stone Age to the Iron Age This could include:- late Neolithic hunter-gatherers and early farmers, e.g. Skara Brae  – Bronze Age religion, technology and travel, e.g. Stonehenge
- Iron Age hill forts: tribal kingdoms, farming, art and culture
This is entirely new.
2. Romans, Anglo-Saxons and Vikings in Britain – study of how British society was shaped by the movement & settlement of different peoples in the period before the Norman Conquest & an in-depth study of how British society was affected by: - Roman- or Anglo-Saxon- or Viking settlement. 3. Roman Empire and its impact on Britain This could include:- Julius Caesar’s attempted invasion in 55-54 BC- the Roman Empire by AD 42 and the power of its army- successful invasion by Claudius and conquest, including Hadrian’s Wall- British resistance, e.g. Boudica- “Romanisation” of Britain: sites such as Caerwent and the impact of technology, culture and beliefs, including early Christianity Although there was always a choice between studying the Romans, Anglo-Saxon and Vikings, many schools chose to teach all three.Note, the content is only suggested & is not too dissimilar to the examples of study for the Romans in Curriculum 2000.
4. Britain’s settlement by Anglo-Saxons and Scots This could include:Roman withdrawal from Britain in c. AD 410 and the fall of the western Roman EmpireScots invasions from Ireland to north Britain (now Scotland)Anglo-Saxon invasions, settlements and kingdoms: place names andvillage lifeAnglo-Saxon art and cultureChristian conversion – Canterbury, Iona and Lindisfarne The Anglo-Saxon and Viking Studies (along with the Romans) have now become a required part of the KS.2 curriculum. Presumably so children don’t leave primary without studying them.Anglo-Saxon history has been divided into two separate studies – before and after Alfred the Great and the creation of the kingdom of England.Presumably schools can choose to teach the two areas at different times in KS2.
  5. Viking and Anglo-Saxon struggle for the Kingdom of England to the time of Edward the Confessor This could include:- Viking raids and invasion
- resistance by Alfred the Great and Athelstan, first king of England – further Viking invasions and Danegeld
- Anglo-Saxon laws and justice
- Edward the Confessor and his death in 1066
3. Victorian Britain or Britain since 1930 – Teachers can choose between:Victorian BritainA study of the impact of significant individuals, events and changes in work and transport on the lives of men, women and children from different sections of societyBritain since 1930A study of the impact of the Second World War or social and technological changes that have taken place since 1930, on the lives of men, women and children from different sections of society. 6. A study of an aspect or theme in British history extends chronological knowledge beyond 1066  For example: - the changing power of monarchs using case studies such as John, Anne and Victoria- changes in an aspect of social history, such as crime and punishment from the Anglo-Saxons to the present or leisure and entertainment in the 20th Century- the legacy of Greek or Roman culture (art, architecture or literature) on later periods in British history, including the present day- a significant turning point in British history, e.g. the first railways or the Battle of Britain I’ve put the Victorians and Britain since 1930 together with this study because although they are far from an exact match there is some similarity.This unit seems a very exciting opportunity for schools to spread their wings in KS.2 and offers an opportunity for exploring a wide diversity of different areas.
4. A world history study- A study of the key features, including the everyday lives of men, women and children, of a past society selected from: Ancient Egypt, Ancient Sumer, the Assyrian Empire, the Indus Valley, the Maya, Benin, or the Aztecs. 7. The achievements of the earliest civilizations – an overview of where and when the first civilizations appeared and a depth study of one of the following: Ancient Sumer; The Indus Valley; Ancient Egypt; The Shang Dynasty of Ancient China Ancient Egypt is back! That should please most schools. Although it is, (as it has always been), only one of a list of different options.
5. Britain and the wider world in Tudor times – study of some significant events and individuals, including Tudor monarchs, who shaped this period and of the everyday lives of men, women & children from different sections of society. 8. A non-European society - one study chosen from:- Early Islamic civilization, c. AD 900;- Mayan civilization c. AD 900;- Benin c. AD 900-1300. The Tudors are gone (unless you choose to teach them in the local history study or Britain Beyond 1066). In their place is a second non-European study. I suspect this is going to be the most difficult for schools to resource and plan.
6. A European history study- A study of Ancient Greece and the influence of their civilization. 9. Ancient Greece – a study of Greek life and achievements and their influence on the western world No change

Implications for KS.2

  • Some of the units are familiar and schools will find they have the necessary resources and teaching expertise. Others are going to need new resource; the ‘non-European society’ is probably the most challenging in this regard.
  • It is very interesting that the authors of the new curriculum decided to split the study of Anglo-Saxon history into two units. This puts a great deal more focus on this period than in the past. In my experience age-appropriate books on the Anglo-Saxons do not contain the kinds of information the new curriculum requires and teachers who find themselves teaching these units may need to make a lot of their own information resources.
  • At KS.2 the new curriculum involves a considerable increase in content, from six to nine units. However:
    • The local history unit can be combined with another unit to reduce the overall number to eight.
    • And, significantly, the overview of the new curriculum makes it clear not all units have to be studied to the same depth: “In planning teachers should combine overview & depth studies”. The definition of ‘overview’ and ‘depth’ has serious implications for curriculum design and classroom study time and schools will probably want clarification on this matter from the DfE.
    • There was a suggestion during the consultation period that schools would be required to teach the history curriculum chronologically, this has been dropped. However, it would seem to make obvious sense to teach the Pre-history unit, the Roman Britain unit and the two Anglo-Saxon units sequentially and fit the other units in around them. (I’ve made a suggestion of how this might be done as a history curriculum map for KS.2).
    • Teaching the history curriculum sequentially will be challenging in mixed-age classes. What’s new?

 

Some thoughts on the new history curriculum

Despite many people’s fears the new history curriculum is not nearly as prescriptive, content-laden or Anglocentric as the original draft suggested it might be. It seems the outcry had its effect and the people in the secret committees at the DfE had second thoughts. All of which is welcome. As I hope the tables demonstrate, in terms of purposes and aims, the two programmes of study are very similar. Enquiry is still included; questioning, interrogating, organising and communicating are still considered important historical study skills; and knowledge and understanding are still at the centre of what we want to achieve.

It is a relief to see that rote learning and regurgitating dates, monarchs and battles has not become the prescribed pedagogy, although the new curriculum rightly stresses the importance of chronological understanding, coherent knowledge and placing the students’ growing historical understanding into different contexts.

If we were to search for clues as to how the history curriculum is be best taught (as there is no prescribed method) then it is worth analysing the following paragraph from subject’s purpose of study:

“A high-quality history education will help pupils gain a coherent knowledge and understanding of Britain’s past and that of the wider world. It should:

  • Inspire pupils’ curiosity to know more about the past.
  • Equip pupils to ask perceptive questions, think critically, weigh evidence, sift arguments, and develop perspective and judgement.
  • Help pupils to understand the complexity of people’s lives, the process of change, the diversity of societies and relationships between different groups, as well as their own identity and the challenges of their time.”

 

A (Possible) Curriculum Map based on the KS2 Programmes of Study for History

Rationale:

  • I’ve spread the eight units out evenly over the four years of KS.2, deliberately leaving the middle term of each year free. My thinking is this gives teachers a choice, either to continue the previous term’s study, start the next term’s early or plan it as a non-history teaching term.
  • The British study units have been planned in chronological order: Pre-History, Romans, Anglo-Saxons (before Alfred the Great), Anglo-Saxons (struggles), and a study of British history after 1066.
  • The local history study has been left off the map; schools can either plan a separate unit or incorporate it with one of the British history units.
  • I’ve put the ‘open British history study’ at the end of Year 6 because it makes sense chronologically and because it gives Year 6 teachers the flexibility to plan in and around the SATs.
  • The three ‘non-British’ units have been mapped with the Ancient Egyptians first, chronologically this makes sense (although of course it depends on school’s choosing Ancient Egypt as the subject of study), it also makes sense for other reasons (although these are subjective):
  1. The cultural ‘story’ of Ancient Egypt revolves around the myth of the weighing of the heart and the legend of Seth and Osiris. These are both accessible to children of Year 4.
  2. The iconography of wall paintings and hieroglyphics seems to hold a fascination with young children and along with the pantheon of Egyptian Gods seems more accessible than their Ancient Greek counter-parts.
  3. The history study of Ancient Greece is focused on the achievements and influences of it’s great thinkers, architects, and story-tellers. These (it could be argued) are a much more demanding subjects and probably better understood by older children
  4. I’ve put the ‘non-European society’ study at the end of year 5 as it seems the best compromise, but of course it could fit in elsewhere.

Click to Download as a Word document

Click here to view as a PDF

 

22 Comments

Leave a comment
  1. Hollowspy July 17, 2013 at 10:13 pm #

    Great post. We have been looking at this in depth at school and were spitting feathers since Feb. we too liked the revision and were pleased that it retained a lot of the common sense and popular aspects of the 2000 curriculum.
    Given that we teach mixed-aged classes too, the dropping of the chronological aspect relieved the biggest threat to conforming.

    For the first time, he was either overruled or persuaded to change his mind,….phew!

  2. Liz August 30, 2013 at 7:46 pm #

    FINAL version July 2013. I’ve noticed that the KS1 history curriculum has much more emphasis on comparative studies in the ‘overview’ units and that assessment should be clearly linked to PoS. Teaching and learning approaches therefore, in which children might ‘upload’ the knowledge required of them, is to continue to design and plan in immediate assessment for learning, progressively more detailed, in the form of the 5Ws, discussions, questions and answers during hot-seating and conscience ally, games and quizzes, both in spoken and then in written formats – ‘act up, write down’. I agree the depth studies makes change manageable – teachers could utilise existing plans and update them with new additions which I thought most teachers liked doing anyway when they find themselves in the same year group for a number of years. As a curriculum leader, I’ve had a go at designing the history map, ready to share and discuss with my colleague the history subject leader when we get back. We aim to introduce history in Autumn 1 and 2 to the school. This way, we can use it as a model for change for the remaining PoS. The history leader can then monitor her subject, hold staff meetings and develop it throughout the year according to further pupil-needs. History is a good one to get change going. I’m now in the process of writing a curriculum action plan to roll out the other units. By the way Tim, it would be good to know your role within education. Liz, Assistant Head Teacher, Y6 teacher, Curriculum Leader, from a primary school in West London.
    (NB If there was a facility to upload on this site, I could share extracts from our new curriculum map.)

    • Tim Taylor August 30, 2013 at 9:04 pm #

      Hello Liz
      Thank you for your comment, I agree with all of your analysis. Part of my role is supporting schools on curriculum and pedagogy, I work in primary education. You can find more information here: http://www.imaginative-inquiry.co.uk/about-us/

      It would be great if you could share some of your work. I have set up a separate site with @michaelt1969 here: http://curriculum2014.wordpress.com/ If you like I could set you up with an admin account so you could upload resources. Tim

  3. Lizzie Overton (@enliven_ed) September 10, 2013 at 4:20 pm #

    Such great work here – thanks so much for your time unravelling this all so helpfully. This does seem to be an opportunity for some really positive work in schools. Do you know if anyone has made the same analysis of the other curriculum areas?

    • Tim Taylor September 10, 2013 at 4:38 pm #

      Thank you Lizzie, we are gradually working our way through. For more information please visit:

  4. Scotty Ind September 24, 2013 at 5:55 pm #

    I am disgusted that the Tudors have vanished. For all of Gove’s beliefs surrounding chronology and a British history, he has decided to get rid of a key part! I am utterly shocked, and will continue to teach the Tudors by edging it in as a local study. Horrendous decision.

    • Tim Taylor September 26, 2013 at 3:38 pm #

      I think he was very wedded to the idea of teaching English history chronologically. Once he was convinced that not all of English history, up until the Glorious Revolution, could be taught in KS2, he had to give up teaching the Tudors explicitly. However, I think the new POS have left enough opportunity in the Local History unit (as you noted) and in the British history post-1066, for teaching the Tudors if schools still want to. Seems like the best of both worlds to me.

  5. Sarah Girling September 26, 2013 at 3:10 pm #

    Thank you for this overview, Tim.
    Your work has caught the attention of those of us who work in Museum education and I think you have heartened us. many of us work with local history collections and are relieved to find local history back in. I’ll be sharing your work with GEM – Group for Education in Museums, who will find your overview extremely helpful.

    • Tim Taylor September 26, 2013 at 3:34 pm #

      Thank you Sarah. I’m glad it is useful. Please let me know if I can help with any projects you may have in mind.

  6. Lynn Tarrant October 24, 2013 at 2:07 am #

    All of our resources on the Aztecs will be redundant so many good opportunities in this unit for looking at history from different perspectives. I wonder why this unit wasn’t included in the non European unit

  7. Luke October 31, 2013 at 12:54 pm #

    Hello Tim,

    Would you mind if I e-mailed you the history map which I have created for our school? It covers KS1 and KS2 and I would be interested in your thoughts as to how well you think it could work and whether it covers everything.

    If so, could you please let me know your e-mail.

    Many thanks,
    Luke

  8. Julie Garlick November 25, 2013 at 11:23 pm #

    Hi Tim, thank you for such a fantastic link. I am history coordinator at a junior school and all teachers are going into a panic! So much of our history is cross curricular with literacy. Everyone is asking me if we will have to ditch all our planning. I have done so much research, but I still don’t seem to have the answers and I am getting so confused! We cover the ancient Greeks throughout our school in a Greek week. Is there any way that we can keep the Victorians, Tudors and WW2 ? it seems that there are ways around slotting them in, but I’m not sure if we can do all of them? Would appreciate hearing your thoughts on this. Thanks Julie

    • Tim Taylor November 25, 2013 at 11:37 pm #

      Hello Julie
      I think the answer is, yes:
      1. Keep your Ancient Greece week for Unit 9: Ancient Greece
      2. Then fit Victorians, Tudors & WW2 into Units 1 & 6 (Local History & British History after 1066)

      There is nothing in the curriculum to say you can’t do two Local History or British History studies, as long as you find time to fit in the others! Its a lot of history, but if the teachers like teaching the topics and the students like studying them, then it is all good. Remember the national curriculum is only the minimum we need to teach.

      • Julie Garlick November 27, 2013 at 10:03 am #

        Thanks Tim, that is really helpful. Julie

  9. Tim Curtis November 27, 2013 at 11:52 am #

    Thank you Tim,
    You put a lot of time, effort, thought and patience into this impenetrable fog of claim, counter claim and change!
    I have found your comments and analysis really, really useful as, like other commentators, I have been grappling with this since February to very little avail.
    I should be able to move the schools I consult with forward now with much more confidence and positivity!

  10. Bilkis Umerji January 4, 2014 at 12:17 pm #

    Has anybody devised a revised new curriculum map showing the coverage of the new curriculum? Please can you share.

  11. Bilkis Umerji January 4, 2014 at 12:19 pm #

    Hi Tim,

    I can see Luke has shared with you a school curriculum map to the coverage of the new curriculum, can Luke or anyone please share?

  12. Eddie Fu February 14, 2014 at 9:21 am #

    I believe many primary schools are missing a trick here! The emphasis on Chronology has been present since 2002 but from my experience of seeing the history curriculae of over a two dozen primary schools in my locality at no point has it ever been properly addressed! Teaching chronology does not have to mean Year 1 studying Ancient Egypt, Year 2 studying Greeks and Romans, Year 3 studyibng Medieval-Tudors etc… Teaching chronology should be about explicitly looking at change over a vast expanse of time and appreciating the ways thing change, the context and place of those changes and the way those changes fit into a story of development. For example, many primary schools study what homes were like in every period they cover (across 6-7 years of study), why not have a scheme of work that JUST looks at how homes change across 200 years from Ancient Egypt, Romans, Medieval, Tudor, Victorian, 20th Century (all done in a half term!).
    I am a Specialist Leader of Education who is running a project with primary consortiums to make these very changes. The reality is that no new lessons or resources are required as all it involves is a new way of looking at history delivery that re-jiggles what already exists.
    This is an old message from the Historical Asscociation that has been rebranded in a new way that would assist primary school history achieve the aims of the new curriculum and go beyond.

  13. Fidelia Nimmons March 7, 2014 at 3:22 pm #

    Hi Tim,

    Great work on the new history curriculum. I would like to share this web link on a non-European society that provides contrasts with British history- Benin:

    http://kingdomofbenin.weebly.com/domain-words.html.

    The website has received some great comments and I am sure that teachers will find it helpful in teaching this unit. The blog section too, has links to other websites with good teaching materials in other subject areas.

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Sshh, this new primary history curriculum is really rather good | Teacher Network | Guardian Professional - July 16, 2013

    [...] full analysis of the new primary history curriculum compared to the old is available here and a suggested curriculum map for key stage [...]

  2. UKEdMag: Opportunities with the New Key Stage One Curriculum | UKEdChat.com - Supporting the #UKEdChat Education Community - February 15, 2014

    […] Tim Taylor has done a very good comparison of the old and new primary curriculum and for infant teachers very little has changed, unless you want it to. See the link here. […]

Leave a Reply

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox

Join other followers: